Peter Crouch said Thomas Tuchel has sent a message through Callum Hudson-Odoi’s “humiliating” substitution in Southampton draw on Saturday.

Tuchel himself admitted that he was maybe “being harsh” on the 20-year-old winger but also insisted it was not “a big thing” (via Chelsea’s official website).

Such a bold decision, however, understandably invited a lot of negative attention.

Previously, Frank Leboeuf argued that there are other Chelsea players who deserved to be taken off instead.

Fellow former Blue Glenn Hoddle even said that Hudson-Odoi looked “really sharp” and actually made the difference when he was on the pitch.

Biggest STAR Your Club Are Trying To SIGN This Month

And now Crouch has had his say about the issue from a former player’s perspective.

(Photo by Visionhaus)

“Listen, it’s awful for the player involved,” he told the Daily Mail.

“I can imagine, from what I know of the game, that Hudson-Odoi will have people in his camp telling him that Tuchel was a disgrace and disrespectful.

“It is the ultimate humiliation for a player, it’s very degrading.

“I can look at it another way, however, and it is striking that Tuchel has shown he is not to be messed around with; he is not afraid to make big decisions.

“Jose Mourinho used to do it and Tuchel wants to show who is boss.”

Chelsea v Wolverhampton Wanderers - Premier League
(Photo by Darren Walsh/Chelsea FC via Getty Images)

Chronicle view

Crouch’s argument about Tuchel’s making a point about “who is boss” is clearly interesting, because there are many who came up with a similar reasoning.

But was it really worth the risk of damaging a young talent’s confidence?

Have something to tell us about this article?