Alan Hudson insists Frank Lampard should’ve bought Tottenham Hotspur talisman Harry Kane whilst he was still in charge of Chelsea, speaking to Caught Offside.

Lampard oversaw plenty of big-name signings last summer.

Kai Havertz, Timo Werner, Hakim Ziyech and Ben Chilwell all arrived at Stamford Bridge for major money, with Thiago Silva also joining on a free.

Chelsea Unveil New Signing Kai Havertz
LONDON, ENGLAND – SEPTEMBER 04: Kai Havertz signs for Chelsea FC alongside Head Coach Frank Lampard at Stamford Bridge on September 4, 2020 in London, England. (Photo by Darren Walsh/Chelsea FC via Getty Images)

But there was no movement for Kane, who remains as Spurs’ leading striker.

However, plenty has been made about the England captain’s future and whether he is reaching his optimum potential in North London.

Hudson, a former Chelsea midfielder, believed the Blues should’ve swept up Kane at the beginning of the season.

He said: “Harry Kane would be an asset for any team in the world.

“Although I think he’s carrying a bit of an injury, or he’s a little unhappy at the moment, he is the best Number 9 in the world, and he’s playing in a very negative team.

Aston Villa v Tottenham Hotspur - Premier League
BIRMINGHAM, ENGLAND – MARCH 21: Harry Kane of Tottenham Hotspur celebrates after scoring a goal to make it 0-2 during the Premier League match between Aston Villa and Tottenham Hotspur at Villa Park on March 21, 2021 in Birmingham, United Kingdom. Sporting stadiums around England remain under strict restrictions due to the Coronavirus Pandemic as Government social distancing laws prohibit fans inside venues resulting in games being played behind closed doors. (Photo by Matthew Ashton – AMA/Getty Images)

“If he played at Manchester City, he’d have 100 goals this season. And had he been at Chelsea when Frank Lampard took over, he might have scored the same amount at the Bridge.

“I don’t call it hindsight because there is so much money on Roman’s yacht, but had I been Frank, I’d have thought with such a cheque book, I’d have kept Eden Hazard at all costs, bought Kane and Jack Grealish and just sat on my yacht and not bothered where I ended up.”

Had Chelsea secured Kane, it would go down as one of Premier League’s most substantial transfers.

Crossing the capital divide in itself would raise eyebrows, with very few brave enough to switch allegiances between the fierce rivals.

The cost of such a deal would also earn its fair share of recognition.

According to the Telegraph, Tottenham will be charging £120m for any club wanting to obtain their prized asset.

Aston Villa v Tottenham Hotspur - Premier League
BIRMINGHAM, ENGLAND – MARCH 21: Harry Kane of Tottenham Hotspur during the Premier League match between Aston Villa and Tottenham Hotspur at Villa Park on March 21, 2021 in Birmingham, United Kingdom. Sporting stadiums around England remain under strict restrictions due to the Coronavirus Pandemic as Government social distancing laws prohibit fans inside venues resulting in games being played behind closed doors. (Photo by Matthew Ashton – AMA/Getty Images)

But perhaps most significantly from a Chelsea standpoint, they’d be gaining a recognised world-class forward with a mesmerising goalscoring record.

This is something the Blues have been lacking, especially under Thomas Tuchel.

Kane would surely sort that issue if he ever decided to swap Tottenham white for Chelsea blue.

Keep up to date with all the latest Chelsea news and opinion by following The Chelsea Chronicle’s Twitter account here.

Have something to tell us about this article?